Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi, I have a 5506-X that was running 9.6 with a simple setup that had a small external switch to bridge the inside, firepower, and our network together. I upgraded to 9.9(1) and wanted to make use of the new BVI feature and eliminate the external s...
They do, all interfaces that are part of a bridge group receive copies of all traffic on each of the interfaces including broadcasts. BUT, when setting up NAT rules, they must be duplicated for each physical interface. IMHO the physical interfaces ...
got it! "nat (outside,any)" changed to a bunch of "nat (outside, inside_1)"this was the key to the solution. turns out that even though you can have a few ports "bridged" you still have to repeat the nat rules specifically for each physical interfac...
got it! "nat (outside,any)" changed to a bunch of "nat (outside, inside_1)"this was the key to the solution. turns out that even though you can have a few ports "bridged" you still have to repeat the nat rules specifically for each physical interfac...
thx! "nat (outside,any)" changed to a "nat (outside, inside_1)"this was the key to the solution. turns out that even though you can have a few ports "bridged" you still have to repeat the nat rules specifically for each physical interface - both the...
Hi did you get the port forwarding to a bridge-group inside-server working? I've tried everything but the packet trace gets to un-nat and matches the correct rule and shows the proper host and port target - but then chokes with a "no valid adjacency...
