Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am wondering if it is necessary to use `url "/*"' in a content rule using arrowpoint-cookie. I have been using arrowpoint-cookie for years and have never used the url command unless I needed a specific layer 5 feature like header field rule.Recent...
Hi, I have 2 css11506's running active/standby with virtual interface redundancy and asr. Recently while doing some work on our network I had failed over to the standby css for a few hours. During this time of course asr copied flow info between th...
Hi, looking at the docs related to keepalives on the css-11506 I noticed there is a "css max" and a "Concurrent MAX". Can someone tell me what the concurrent max means? The numbers are pretty low for that. Here is the chart I was referring to:Keepa...
Hi, I'm wondering what you guys recommend for boosting performance on a css-11506. I understand that adding an additional scm will only help in terms of redundancy since a second scm will run only in a passive state. If I don't need any more networ...
We have an app seeing "phantom slowness" and the developers are pointing fingers at the fact that we have two content rules, one of which uses header field inspection.We use header field rules on other content rules with no problem. Is it possible t...
Thanks Gilles. I am already using gig interfaces on the CSS5-SCM-2GE module and also have a CSS5-IOM-2GE. Just looking for more cpu to handle traffic. I'll look in to buying a SAM module.Thanks as usual for the help.-Dan
Thanks Gilles. Yes I am doing sniffer traces to help figure this out. For the performance hit, wouldn't it be overall on the css or would it be for the one particular vip? Seems like the processing wou;d affect overall performance of the css.-Dan