What image is comparable to catalyst C6800 or C9500 on EVE-NG ?

[JOSEPH93]

Hi all,

I am looking in vain for a catalyst switch image comparable to Cisco catalyst C6800 or C9500, in order to use it on EVE-NG.
In my lab, I have to use it as a distribution switch (CE) and apply the following functionalities:

- configure vlans and do inter-vlan routing
- configure VRFs in subinterfaces
- configure OSPF and BGP routings via subinterfaces

Unfortunately, I notice that the switch images available on EVE-NG do not allow you to achieve all of these functionalities ON THE SAME EQUIPMENT.
In particular, I used the Cisco vIOS Switch and Cisco vIOS Router image templates.
Perhaps should we modify the parameters of these images in EVE-NG or apply specific command lines? which ones ?
In real life we ​​use the C6800 and C9500 catalysts with which these features are present and work well.

Find here attached the topology associated to my lab and below is an approach to the configurations to be applied and which pose problems. 

NB: YOU WILL NOTICE THAT
on the Cisco vIOS Router ==> impossible to configure Vlans, Port-Channel interfaces, switchports
on the Cisco vIOS Switch ==> impossible to configure OSPF and BGP routings in the subinterfaces, or even VRFs in the subinterfaces.

Thanks for your help !

CE1#

ip vrf TEST
rd 412:6789
!
vlan 69
name Admin
!
vlan 500
name DATA
!
interface Loopback0
description LBK-GRT-CE1
ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255
!
interface Loopback6
description LBK-TEST-CE1
ip vrf forwarding TEST
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface Port-channel1
description CE1<>CE2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,69,500
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 99
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
spanning-tree guard loop
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description GRT_CE<>Gi0/0/0/0
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.201
description GRT_CE<>Gi0/0/0/0_201
encapsulation dot1Q 201
ip address 192.168.0.5 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip ospf dead-interval 10
ip ospf hello-interval 3
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.101
description TEST_CE<>Gi0/0/0/0_101
encapsulation dot1Q 101
ip vrf forwarding TEST
ip address 192.168.31.5 255.255.255.252
bfd interval 500 min_rx 500 multiplier 3
!
interface Vlan69
description ADMIN
ip address 192.168.117.29 255.255.255.224
standby version 2
standby 69 ip 192.168.117.30
!
interface Vlan500
description LAB_TEST
ip vrf forwarding TEST
ip address 192.168.0.252 255.255.255.0
standby version 2
standby 700 ip 192.168.0.254
!

[MHM Cisco World]

I use eve-ng and vIOS sw/R can do all command you need for your topolgy

Whcih command is missing in eve-ng ?

The only some missing commands is for bgp multi path and vrf to global.

I dont think you use these commands here or I am wrong?

MHM

[JOSEPH93]

Hi MHM,

Thanks for your reply.

My objective is to implement this succession of commands lines on the same equipment.
As it stands, when you use the Cisco vIOS Router, it's not possible to configure Vlans, Port-Channel interfaces, switchports. Meanwhile, using the Cisco vIOS Switch it's not possible to configure OSPF routings in SUBINTERFACES, or even VRFs in SUBINTERFACES.

if you succeed, don't hesitate to tell me the trick to carry out the command lines that I mentioned on one and the same piece of equipment.

Thanks and Regards,

[MHM Cisco World]

subinterface work with ospf and bgp in vIOS Switch in eve-ng 
there is no issue at all

MHM

[JOSEPH93]

Hi MHM,

May be am i wrong somewhere. All i need is to get the image used to achieve those specific command lines. Could you please share us the switch image you used on EVE-NG ?

This is the switch image that i use for my lab test on EVE-NG : Cisco vIOS Switch

Obviously, as i said, using the Cisco vIOS Switch it's not possible to configure OSPF routings in SUBINTERFACES, or even VRFs in SUBINTERFACES.

In my case, could you implement this lines commands on interface Gi0/0.2001 :

  ip vrf  forwarding TEST

 ip address 192.168.0.5 255.255.255.252

  ip ospf network point-to-point

[MHM Cisco World · Accepted solution]

did you first change the main port to router port via 

no switchport <<-

MHM

[JOSEPH93]

Indeed, that was the problem.

Thank you very much. 

[MHM Cisco World]

Friend 

You are so welcome 

Have  a nice summer 

MHM