About mnavada

mnavada · 03-03-2020

ebgp-multihop 255 this wont work in the IOS XR but no issue in ios router. the moment i execute this command in xr i see the pop action appear for loopback adress which is pointing to other AS. 2.2.2.2/32-65000-R2-----9.9.9.9/32-65001-XR9- MP-EBGP ...

mnavada · 03-11-2020

Hi Elvin, Looks like one more solution we have for the same.Remove ebggp-multihop mpls command replace with next hop unchanged along with ebgp-multihop 255. See the output below RP/0/0/CPU0:ios#sh run router bgpThu Mar 12 09:01:26.721 UTCrouter bgp 6...

mnavada · 03-10-2020

Hi Harold, I agree with that solution but that is using RR as a control plane. The Question i put up before is Option C without RR. R2--->R5----MPIBGP VPNV4 Peering R5--->XR6----EBGP Labeled unicast XR6--->XR9----MPIBGP VPNV4 Peering R2-->XR9----M...

mnavada · 03-09-2020

XR9 configured with ebgp-multihop 255 see the result below RP/0/0/CPU0:ios#config tMon Mar 9 20:10:31.543 UTCRP/0/0/CPU0:ios(config)#router bgp 65001RP/0/0/CPU0:ios(config-bgp)#neighbor 2.2.2.2RP/0/0/CPU0:ios(config-bgp-nbr)#address-family vpnv4 un...

mnavada · 03-09-2020

I Let me explain Scenario 1 : R2 and XR9 are MP-ebgp vpnv4 peering configured. Scenario 2 : I have shut the RR link towards R4 and R8 this is purely option C without RR. Scenario 3 : R2 to R9 one LSP will be formed (19-vpn label) when you do th...

Member Since	‎03-03-2020 04:40 AM
Date Last Visited	‎03-13-2020 02:22 AM
Posts	5

User Statistics

User Activity

MPLS option C without RR

Re: MPLS option C without RR

Re: MPLS option C without RR

Re: MPLS option C without RR

Re: MPLS option C without RR