Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hey @IWard , thank you for sharing the insights, based on the information you have shared I would recommend you open a TAC Case so we can investigate further. It´s strange since some organizations have shared that the issue has been fixed after the v...
Hello.
We have investigated about this SHA-256 (c5c83bbc1741be6ff4c490c0aee34c162945423ec577c646538b2d21ce13199e) and found that this is a benign file, hence this file should now be allowed on your environment.
Since the file verdict was changed, the...
Hey,
Based on the information that you have provided, this goes beyond a firewall rule to allow the connection, it looks to be related to a proxy issue.
There's a public Bug already posted that matches this behavior --> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.co...
The Firefox SHA-256 (5b2abf9947a12ff9cc3765e48d875d97752193fcbc5e2b89fdb3e138c3232568) is not related to the FP event from today.
Although this is an Exploit Prevention event, it is probably being generated because a 3rd party acting with Firefox and...
I'm wondering which SHA-256 are you getting alerted?
Also if this matches the initial one, I would suggest you open a TAC case with FMC, since this SHA-256 is already marked as clean, and probably is not being populated to your device, correctly.
SHA...
