Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all,
My ACI journey continues, and I invariably end up back here looking for help.
I am currently working through a design for a "shared services" tenant in our environment.
What I'd like to do is:
-in Shared Services tenant, have one BD w...
Hi all,
I've got an ACI fabric deployed, and we are in the process of establishing our monitoring approach. For major stuff, we're looking at coding something against the API for Health Alerts and stuff.
For some of the more basic stuff (is the le...
Hi gang,
the learning curve continues!
In our environment, we have a collection of tenants, and each tenant has a collection of subnets. The subnets are defined at the EPG level.
Some of the teams using this environment need to be able to have mu...
Hi all,
we are deploying ACI for a lab environment and we'd like to monitor it.
the web ui is helpful, but manual.
we could poll SNMP the good old fashioned way. we can capture syslog output. We could use the APIs.
but before we go too far down...
Hi gang,
I am struggling to understand when you could create a subnet under a Bridge Domain vs on an EPG. Is there any guidance as to when each option is more favourable?
In my fairly simply use case, we are using ACI for mostly dev/test networks,...
Thanks Joe. All very interesting!
i (sort of) understand the risk, but it just seems so counter to ACI policy model as far as I've learned so far. It sounds like I basically need a subnet per service which I can do easily enough with any L3 networ...
Thanks Joe.
So if I understand correctly then, this is not much different from traditional networking where servers that serve a common service (like DNS servers) need to be on the same subnet and in the same EPG. is that correct?
I have managed t...
A quick follow up to say that I got the BD-to-BD route leaking working. I just wasn't exporting/importing properly.
However, I'd still appreciate any guidance on the "right way" to do this...
Another question that comes up too is whether or not t...
This seems to explain the behaviour that we are seeing, so at least it's expected behaviour and not something we're doing wrong.
it sounds like the options at this point are:
1.) get the "silent" VM to not be silent. create *some* sort of network ...
Creating a second BD for the 192.168.0 subnet makes it work - as does adding a second subnet to the EPG (noted above - looks like we crossed paths).
it's just not how the teams automating this stuff are working... but we may be able to (i.e. have to...
