Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all, I'm experiencing a strange NSO Device Templates behavior. Hope you can give me guidance.
The scenario is straightforward, customer wants to deploy a qos policy, using NSO templates. Configuration works fine in both netsim and physical device ...
Hi @Alexander Stevenson
I deal with this Yang Suite about a month ago. By the end, I've created a new python 8 environment (3.8.19) and installed all the dependencies. Didn't see any relevant issue at that time.
In attach, you have the pip freeze, i...
Hi @ysfabnsr ,Reading your post I saw you already know what you have to do... For long term, you need to run a services redesign.One thing you can evaluate as a workaround is run service A re-deploy right after the service B delete operation in your ...
Hi @MAMADOUTOURE2733 ,Per my understanding of the reported, you are configuring stuff in the device manager via service manager, and are questioning the config diff provided after promote a service change.Have you tried to do a "show run devices devi...
Hi @MAMADOUTOURE2733 ,As you mentioned, there is no "force" element in the NED yang tree. I can confirm it based on the ned yang analysis below:
% pyang -f tree --tree-path=/interface/Ethernet/channel-group tailf-ned-cisco-nx.yang --ignore-errors
mo...
Hi Atsushi @anemo-608 ,In the projects I've being involved, as part of the design we determine a template name convention to facilitate the navigation, in general we use <vendor>-<feature>-free_string.xml, but since you already have a service develop...
