Refer to traceroute consideration for PBR
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/data-center-virtualization/application-centric-infrastructure/white-paper-c11-739971.html#_Toc522749020)
there was this bug which is fixed in 3.2x
CSCvh9...
I have seen something similar in past, you should try to rebuilt the RIAD. You can follow the following document.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/cloud-systems-management/application-policy-infrastructure-controller-apic/215166-apic-ssd-...
Route learned in VRF A for from OSPF will use MP-BGP vpnv4 address family to leak the route from one vrf to another.
Pretty much same way how it would happen on MPLE PE b/w two vrf.
When you mark the subnet as shared under the L3out, under the hood ...
For simple service graph with no PBR as explained in the SG design whitepaper would be easiest.
for design options with routing enabled in both Provider and Consumer BDs you can go through the following in the document.
Figure 25. If Routing is En...
you can verify if the controller is healthy with the following command..
a-apic1# show controller detail id 1ID : 1*Name : a-apic1UUID : 003ea778-57ea-11ea-b84f-85e33067b015Pod ID : 1Address : 10.0.0.1In-Band IPv4 Address : 14.2.104.228In-Band IPv6 A...