Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi Team, I am trying to implement QOS on my Cisco ASR100 Router. Following is the set of Class Maps & Policy maps involved. However I'm getting a message saying the "Parent_QOS_SOHO_Softphone" policy-map is in a suspended state within the Port-Channe...
They are dot1q interfaces ASR_1001#show ip int brief | inc PoPort-channel1 unassigned YES unset up upPort-channel1.1751 192.168.21.14 YES NVRAM up upPort-channel1.1752 192.168.21.12 YES NVRAM up upPort-channel1.1753 192.168.21.10 YES NVRAM up upPort-...
Hi Joseph, The main reason for going with "VLAN BASED" is because I wanted to apply policy maps to Port Channel interfaces. Could the following be a solution? i.e - Define Primary and Secondary links for each VLAN? https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/do...
Does this cause traffic to NOT LOAD BALANCE between the Ether Channel members? I recently made this change from FLOW to VLAN based and it stopped splitting traffic between the 2 links and just started taking ALL the traffic on 1 of the ether channel ...
Hi Joseph, It used work fine when it was on "flow-based". So I'm pretty confident that the device and traffic type is capable of load sharing. I'm seeing zero traffic on the second link after changing this to VLAN BASED. Do you think the remote devi...
Hi Marce / All I have applied the change and I can now apply policy maps under the Port channel interfaces. So thank you for that. But after doing that, traffic between the Port channel members aren't load balanced. We have 2 x 1G links making up the...
