Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have two internet connections: Broadstripe cable (WAN1), which has high throughput (15mbps) but unpredictable and at times unacceptable (for gaming) latency, and Speakeasy DSL (WAN2), which has low throughput (1.5mbps) but reliable and stable laten...
Hi,I am trying to direct nearly all traffic to WAN1, which is my high-throughput Broadstripe cable connection. I would like the traffic from certain online games to use only WAN2, which is my low-latency Speakeasy DSL.After a few days of messing arou...
I will try to run additional tests. I have tested WoW and know it to run on the proper WAN port, since if I disbale the WAN port I've bound its port to the game will reliably disconnect. It uses only a couple of ports. My torrents I am pretty sure al...
WoW uses a fixed port, which is how I am able to use protocol binding to route it only through my DSL. I have verified this by unplugging WAN2 while logged into the game, and I can see that it disconnects me from the game server. I also have HTTP and...
In my situation I don't require QoS from anywhere outside my network. I had assumed this Cisco RV042 could provide the local QoS I require. I set up protocol binding to route my games through my low latency Speakeasy DSL, while web browsing, HTTP, NN...
I'll amend this by saying it must work in at least some capacity. The reason I say this is when I change the RV042's protocol binding for port 80 (HTTP) to WAN2, I can visit whatismyip.com and it will come back as my Speakeasy DSL IP. The protocol bi...
