About lubo.nistor

lubo.nistor · 08-04-2005

I've just experienced a X11 communication where xdm direct advertisment went through, but the resulting x11 communication was dropped by pix 515 6.3(4). I noticed that the dropped packet had a source port 0 otherwise it looked fine..As a note: direct...

lubo.nistor · 08-22-2005

well if you have lot of $$ you can go for webtrends package,if not you can stick to opensource and use syslog with some log parsing tool like swatch or similar. But for that you need to know what you would be looking for anyway as it's not that easy ...

lubo.nistor · 08-10-2005

did you guys tried other products than mrtg?even comparing the values from snmpwalk would do..

lubo.nistor · 08-09-2005

nope:-the message comes from log.-it is a source port -there's no rule like that in the access list.the only reasonable explanation is that there's a general protocol analysis and it doesn't like source port 0.but the question is can it be changed?

lubo.nistor · 08-09-2005

the problem is with interface numbering in SNMP. If the numbering changes you get the result from the last one (i think). so either run the discovery script again or modify the config manually..How exactly MRTG works I don't know as I'm using somethi...

lubo.nistor · 08-09-2005

well i did that on 515, it works but you only gain 2 more ifaces.. that is if you have 5 physical you can have max 3 virtual.examples are on this website (at least i've found it here).which OS do you have on Pix?

Member Since	‎08-04-2005 04:56 AM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:54 AM
Posts	6

User Statistics

User Activity

dropped packets with source port 0

Re: Monitoring PIX Firewall

Re: PIX OS 7.0, VLAN, MRTG

Re: dropped packets with source port 0

Re: PIX OS 7.0, VLAN, MRTG

Re: VLAN-based virtual interfaces With PIX 515e