I am planning the migration of a Network 172.16.0.0 Mask 255.255.0.0 to a VLSM VLANS so that I get the following topology:A New range VLSM Subnet of 172.16.0.0/19 for the Actual range of IPs 172.16.0.0 to 172.16.31.254Many Subnets of VLSM CIDR 22 be...
Yes Thank you,It is a good improvement to have in CISCO IOT a kind of translation for allClassfull Masks into Subnetting for the case of a Smooth migration.So as NAT can translate an IP to another, IOT could change incomingtraffic of a full qualified...
I already devided the /16 into a /19 and /22 but is not feasible because of overlapping, in your proposition of /17 and /19 is the same case because I can not reconfigure 1000s of Servers at the same time, I wanted to have a grace time to disappear t...
As I understand, it is not possible because the Suppernet 172.16.0.0 couldnot be mixed with the new Subnets configuration.Is that right ?I understood what you replayed ?I sendit the Switch to you with a specific example.*Is the restriction Network an...
I wonder if it is possible because of overlapping the Network 172.16.0..0/16 Mask 255.255.0.0 with many Subnets 172.16.32.0/16, 172.16.36.0/16 etc.
It is not depending on topology is more a question of Routing and Standards.
As an Example:
N5860-...
I wonder if it is possible because of overlapping the Network172.16.0..0/16 Mask 255.255.0.0 with many Subnets 172.16.32.0/16,172.16.36.0/16 etc.It is not depending on topology is more a question of Routing and Standards.As an Example:
*N5860-48SC - ...
