Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello Everyone, I am having a very strange issue. For reference please check this compatibility matrixhttps://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.htmlI have WLC 9800 17.13.1. As shown in the matrix, 3702i ...
HelloI have a very strange problem as I said in the subject, I have flexconnect enabled and other all related settings enabled but still when controller is unreachable, the APs stop showing SSID and stop working. Controller is: Cisco Catalyst 9800-CL...
I have a controller Cisco Catalyst 9800-CL Wireless Controller 17.13.1. I have AP 3802i and it is running capwap and it is connecting to the Controller successfully. But the problem is that besides the SSID from the controller, there is always anothe...
Controller Version: Virtual 9800 16.12.4aAP: 3702iFollowing is the error I am gettingAug 22 21:21:57.999: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 192.168.70.26:5246Aug 22 21:21:58.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sen...
Hi,I am having an issue,My APs cannot join the controller when they are on NAT, meaning that they are on the same router but different subnets. Controller is fine, it is able to join the APs when they are on the same network. From the AP I am also ab...
Please, kindly suggestshould I upgrade the 17.12.3 Controller for 3702i ? What is your recommendation?For 3802 APs I will change the subnet. ORI will make an access control list in the Controller so that the 3702 APs dont join the 17.13 controller.I ...
Ok this has happened. AgainThere are 2 controllers, 17.12.3 for 3702 and17.13.1 for 3802I had to re-firmware the 3702 APs to make them go to the old controller. they did for a day and now I dont know why they have again gone to the new controller AGA...
So to avoid this i am trying to install a latest release for 3800 APs (17.15.X). I think that is how they will join the desired controller. Just to inform, I always make the APs go find the controller via the CLI. I dont use option 43.
Boss, I am not saying that I am not going to keep using it. I just want to know that how was that possible.AND most importantly, how can I avoid this from happening. -- This is actually what I want now. I need you advice and help brother. Please...
Yes I do understand, but isnt this not suppose to happen? mean should have the controller rejected those APs. I also dont want that to be in this controller. The old version controller is installed, now I have to remove them and re-firmware them.
