Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
The Cisco Nexus 9000 Series NX-OS Interfaces Configuration Guide, Release 10.5(x) tells at chapter Load Balancing Using Port Channels:"Configuring hash load balancing applies to unicast and multicast traffic on Cisco Nexus 9200, 9300-EX, and 9300-GX ...
Hello!According to https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/design/vpc_design/vpc_best_practices_design_guide.pdfGeneral Recommendation: ● Activate vPC peer-switch in a vPC environmentvPC peer-switch can be used in a vPC domai...
Hello,According to official Cisco vPC documentation one use case is:Inside Data Center:◦ Single-sided vPC (access layer or aggregation layer)◦ Double-sided vPC, also called multilayer vPC (access layer using vPC interconnected to aggregation layer us...
Hi!I need to configure 2 Nexus 9K with vPC at aggregation layer. These two switches are distant (500 m) and I need to provide high availability (no single point of failure) to the peer-keepalive link. As recommended by Cisco I create a dedicated VRF ...
Hello there!I'm interested in MultiChassis Etherchannel and MSTP in the same L2 domain.Question 1: MultiChassis Etherchannel (MEC) for Catalyst 9k is supported only with StackWise virtual, is it correct?Question 2: Is it mandatory to enable StackWise...
@MHM Cisco World sorry if I ask basic questions, I have general network experience but not specifically with Cisco switches/features. When creating the L3 PO, can I also create virtual interfaces? In this way I can use one dedicated port and another ...
The document does not mention 9k nd 3k models. But it mentions close to Figure 9 Nexus 7k and 5k. I was looking for a generic statement that Nexus models/releases can be mixed provided that a single domain includes the same model.
Ok thanks. What you suggest is alternative to solution 1). But if I do not have distinct paths available, is the second solution feasible and with no negative consequences?
