Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello there!The Catalyst 9300 Security configuration guide (Cisco IOS XE Dublin 17.12.x) says:"Port ACLs are ACLs that are applied to Layer 2 interfaces on a switch.....Port ACLs can be applied to the interface in inbound and outbound direction." In ...
Hello there!The Catalyst 9300 Security configuration guide (Cisco IOS XE Dublin 17.12.x) says:"Port ACLs are ACLs that are applied to Layer 2 interfaces on a switch.....Port ACLs can be applied to the interface in inbound and outbound direction." In ...
The Cisco Nexus 9000 Series NX-OS Interfaces Configuration Guide, Release 10.5(x) tells at chapter Load Balancing Using Port Channels:"Configuring hash load balancing applies to unicast and multicast traffic on Cisco Nexus 9200, 9300-EX, and 9300-GX ...
Hello!According to https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/design/vpc_design/vpc_best_practices_design_guide.pdfGeneral Recommendation: ● Activate vPC peer-switch in a vPC environmentvPC peer-switch can be used in a vPC domai...
Hello,According to official Cisco vPC documentation one use case is:Inside Data Center:◦ Single-sided vPC (access layer or aggregation layer)◦ Double-sided vPC, also called multilayer vPC (access layer using vPC interconnected to aggregation layer us...
@MHM Cisco World sorry if I ask basic questions, I have general network experience but not specifically with Cisco switches/features. When creating the L3 PO, can I also create virtual interfaces? In this way I can use one dedicated port and another ...
The document does not mention 9k nd 3k models. But it mentions close to Figure 9 Nexus 7k and 5k. I was looking for a generic statement that Nexus models/releases can be mixed provided that a single domain includes the same model.
Ok thanks. What you suggest is alternative to solution 1). But if I do not have distinct paths available, is the second solution feasible and with no negative consequences?
