Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,I am considering a Cisco Catalyst 9800-L controller to replace our WLC 2504. My question is regarding the End of Life. I can only find information on the End of Life for the IOS XE versions, but not for the controller itself. It is expensive...
Hello Cisco community!We currently have a WLC 2504 that uses 1 of the 4 physical ports for both "device management" and "AP management" on the same subnet. There is no VLAN configured on the WLC nor the switch. In fact, we have a completely flat ne...
Can the 2504 be configured to communicate with APs on one physical port while directing the wireless traffic out a different physical port? We want APs on 10.1.7.0 subnet to send wireless data to the WLC (CAPWAP) on 1 physical port and then have tha...
Will access points installed at a branch site (different subnet) automatically find our WLC 2504 at our headquarters over the WAN? The sites are connected via MPLS. Does CAPWAP automatically jump from one subnet to another over a routed network?
@athan1234 , When I was having the issue, I was configuring a backup unit. it was not production. There was only 1 AP associated to the WLC. As I understand it, the issue is due to the controller trying to verify the expired certificate, which fai...
Wow, thanks Scott! If you know, is the IOS XE the OS that runs on the 9800? If that needs to be upgraded, that can be done with a support contract right? I guess I am just confused on why the IOS XE would have an End of Life / End of Sale...
Wow, I have been banging my head on a wall trying to get an AP added to our WLC since 12/6 (the same day as the bug). Re-image the AP, factory reset, converted to Auto mode and back to Lightweight. Then I noticed the cert error on the console log. ...
Hi Scott, thanks for the information! I just want to connect the controller's Wireless Management port (for APs) to a regular 'Access' port (no VLAN) on our core switch. Going off both responses I have received, this appears to be possible by using...