Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Has anyone successfully tested or deployed EVPN Ethernet-Segment multihoming on Cisco NCS540(2x PE's) using the following model?standalone interfaces (non-LACP / non-bundle)dot1q trunk subinterfacesVLAN-based l2transport servicesWe are currently vali...
Has anyone successfully tested or deployed EVPN Ethernet-Segment multihoming on Cisco NCS540 using the following model?standalone interfaces (non-LACP / non-bundle)dot1q trunk subinterfacesVLAN-based l2transport servicesper-interface ESI configuratio...
Hi Yunus,Thanks for the feedback.We already validated that the ESI identifier is identical on both NCS540 PEs and that RT-4 routes are exchanged correctly over BGP EVPN. We also verified there are no route-filters or policy inconsistencies impacting ...
@Yunus Emre DEV wrote:Hello, my friend,EVPN configurations operate in active-active and active-passive modes.Mate, let me say it again: In the scenarios below, you need to configure LACP and set the priority.Whether EVPN MH on standalone interfaces i...
I understand how to implement this with a single router, but I am trying to understand how redundancy should work with two routers.Currently, we use Catalyst VSS, but this will be replaced with NCS540 running IOS-XR.The challenge is that some legacy/...
Thanks for the feedback.Our scenario is specifically related to migrating Catalyst-based access/aggregation services toward Cisco NCS540 running IOS-XR.We already use EVPN multihoming successfully with bundle interfaces + LACP toward devices that sup...
