Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
dears,
i need to check about placing in new DC with 9K instead of 7K with considering that customer requested to start with 9K (Nexus mode) without ACI at the moment with considering upgrade option to ACI in future !
thanks
Dears,
i have a concern regarding deploying and designing firepower next generation IPS appliances 8250 in multi-tenancy deployment, as i need to have inline IPS appliance running in two different zones (edge and DC), at the same time to have higher ...
I think you have a valid point about migration between Nexus mode and then to ACI
but why N9K is not considered as a core compared to N7K with massive throughput and cheaper prices ?
and when is ACI becomes a preferred solution over Nexus mode ?
at the new DC, existing circuits are 2xISP connections, 2x WAN MPLS connections, 2x 10G links to Campus core while DC module was designed to have N7Ks with attached firewalls to UCS and physical servers
when is it feasible to have N9K with Nexus mode...
thanks its a nice video but all about ACI automation and integration with security overview, not about firepower NGIPS solution .
anyway i think as per some researches that NGIPS doesn't support multiple contexts or multi tenants as cisco IPS can do ...