Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have a mac user who needs remote access, so I downloaded the vpn client for our old pix 501. Installed fine, configured I thought fine, but won't connect. The Mac is a macbook pro running OSx 10.6, VPN Client is 4.9.01.0100, Pix is on 6.3(5). I ...
I currently have a PIX 501 with remote users on VPN via the Cisco VPN Client. I have a wireless router that I'd like to put outside my PIX to allow visiting clients/associates wireless internet access without internal LAN access (those that need int...
I'm new to Cisco and I have a Pix 501 running 6.3(5). I found I was unable to ping. So I did some research and found the document "Handling ICMP Pings and traceroute...", applied the access-list as recommended but it didn't appear to work. Then I ...
Thanks, again.Now for something confusing - it worked first time trying it with debug info, and twice more just to make sure it wasn't a fluke. I could copy/paste the debug info, but it seems to work fine.Maybe it's the Mac - The RDC client also wou...
Thanks for the quick reply Yudong,I logged into the pix (telnet) and debug isa doesn't seem to be a valid debug command. It returned the usage list. If I remember right, the old Pix 501 has its own commands - would it be debug crypto ipsec? or debu...
Thanks for the reply Mark.I'm not sure I can (without additional hardware) do the rest the way you suggest.What I have for hardware is: ADSL modem (speedstream 5200? w/1 ethernet) Cisco Pix 501 D-Link wireless router WBR-2310 (think simple home...
Thanks for the reply, Arul.The wireless router I have is a basic one (D-Link Rangebooster G model WBR-2310) so I think I will have to NAT. I plan on setting up a reserved IP like 192.168.0.2 for the PIX, and will forward the ports you mentioned - 50...
Jorge,Thank you for replying. The 'any any' construction was listed for the 7.x version only, so I didn't try it. I tried to duplicate the construction for the 6.3 version and was unable to make it work. Also, I did have the access-group... comman...
