Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello everyone,We are having huge losses with our vMX appliance installed in Azure, first let me introduce the scenario in order to further understand where the problem stands. Below you can find the rough topology which I built for this question:1- ...
Hi @joey.debra ,Thanks a lot for the quick reply. So, do you mean to create a new subnet (i.e. 172.16.0.16/29) for that Meraki interface and attach it a separate route table where there are route entries only concerning the Meraki device ? Because in...
Hi @Todd Wiler ,But how does vMX appliance know where to send the packets without a route table associated to it ? I have the following scenarion, my vMX appliance is running as VPN concentrator mode as a HUB where it has established many S2S VPN con...
Hi CIO1 But how does vMX appliance know where to send the packets without a route table associated to it ? I have the following scenarion, my vMX appliance is running as VPN concentrator mode as a HUB where it has established many S2S VPN connections...
Did you encounter any problems with the establishment of VPNs (site-to-site or client VPN) when upgrading to Standard SKU ? We had some disconnections from our spokes which was not resolved until we reverted back to the BASIC SKU.
Hi Rudri,We observe exavtly the same scenario from our vMX appliance in Azure environment to Spoke MX appliances where a site to site is in place. Could you figure out the solution for this issue ? Thanks
