Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am trying to make two embedded systems on two unconnected networks to talk to each other using a 1921 Cisco router.
Machine A: 10.200.64.1 should think it communicates with 10.200.64.104Machine B: 192.168.0.186 should think it communicates with 192...
I needed to apply just one more change. It stroke me that the bevaviour from outside to inside was different from the inside to outside behavior. So I removed the inside and outside definitions of the two interfaces and configured them with "ip nat e...
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, the results are the same as while using the IP address of the router itself
These are the new NAT rules:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.0.186 10.200.64.103ip nat outside source static 10.200.64.1 192....
Thank you for the suggestion. Of what I understand from the documentation, it would only be applicable if both machine are on a close subnet.
For the two IP ranges that I have got, I would have to configure one of the machines to use subnet mask 0.0....
