Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,I am trying to configure a CBS350 with isolated Private VLANs and a router on a stick.I got so far as to configure the ports I want to isolate as a "Private VLAN - Host".I cannot find a way to configure a Private VLAN Promiscous Trunk Port (A T...
Ah, right, so all or nothing (Switch would have to handle ALL Inter-VLAN-Traffic)Ok, will have to think about that, I am not particularily liking the clunky ACL definition vs Firewall Policies on a router.But ok, now I know my options, thanks a lot ...
Alright, finally got the device into the lab.Testclient <=Access=> Switch <=Trunk=> Router192.168.0.0/24 = Native VLAN Subnet10.10.20.0/24 = Client Subnet192.168.0.1 = Router192.168.0.2 = Switch in VLAN 110.10.20.2 = Switch in VLAN 20What I have done...
Ah interesting, yeah that scenario would work since the isolated devices dont need to access the router.Well, if the CBS350 can route between a isolated and normal vlan, that sounds like a possible solution. Eg. with an intermediate vlan between the ...
I don't understand how that would work. Afaik just using a normal 802.1Q trunk, would have both the primary and secondary vlans going across it, so if I just give the router access to the primary vlan, it wont get any packets from the clients?Or does...
So there really is no way to achieve a promiscuous trunk on lower end switches? Thats sad. That makes the whole feature pretty much useless.But okay, what other alternatives do I have to achieve that without introducing any extra failure points with ...
