Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am usinng sw release 8.0(4), advisory recommends 8.0(4)28, how do I know which interim release I have? Is it by compile date? Interim releases are not shown via "show version" all I have is compile date which is not the current 8.0(4)code and assoc...
I have posted about this subject before, dot1x behavior and dot1x behavior 2. My problem is max-req and max-rerauth-req. The definition of each provided do not appear to match the definition in this Cisco doc "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches...
I performed a "dot1x debug packet" on a XP supplicant. I had reauth-max-req set to 2but I observered 3 EAP code=1 (requests) frames, why ? Also, how does reauth-max-reqdiffer from maxreq? My opinion is that maxreq is for managing the flow from authen...
The only thing I can think of is that your routing table on the ASa is routing packets receeived on the outside out a different interface (i.e not the outside interface?)could be the following;1) Someone is directing spoofed traffic to the outside in...
I apologize, enabling reverse path forwarding is a viable config for the outside interface. It ensures that packets sourced from the outside are not spoofed packets. Perhaps there is a large amount of spoofed traffic hitting the outside interface of ...
You should not be doing reverse path checking on the outside interface. Reverse path checking is typically done on interior interfaces to ensure traffic recieved at the FW interface was sourced from the network the FW interface is confgiured for. Thi...
