Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi All,As I'm doing an EIGRP lab, I noticed a strange behavior with the 'variance' command. Its very possible that I'm missing something, which is why I wanted to ask here so if someone can point out the cause of this behavior or if otherwise the doc...
Hi,I have 2xASA 5510 in a Active/Standby setup. The outside interface is connected through a switch to the ISP router. We are sharing a /27 subnet. We were given a new network but our ISP is not willing to statically route the new network to the next...
One more update. I ran the same toplogy that I used initially in this post bu with a different code (same one I used in the previous post) and the results again, explain what was happening. Check this out: EIGRP-IPv4(100): rcvupdate: 155.1.9.0/24 vi...
okay I think i finally got what is going on. I labbed the exact same topology with a different code version, and it worked just fine. Here is the one that is having issues Version 15.4(2)T: R4(config-if)#int eth 0/2R4(config-if)#del 200*Mar 18 15:03...
Hey Deepak,I'm glad that we are finally in agreement! I know that FD/CD/RD are very poorly documented even on cisco's docs but now you have the accurate understanding of these components that are the core of EIGRP.And yes, I'm changing the Delay on p...
Hi,Thanks for jumping in! the more people participate here the better for sure, we're all trying to learn here.I've seen that link and many many others from Cisco docs and others. . You're saying that FD is the best metric for a route. I'm going to c...
BTW - I know you're probably going to laugh, but I can assure you that Kevin Wallace is wrong. There are many resources and authors got this wrong. FD is one of the most poorly/wrongly documented topic in EIGRP. I just hope someone else would chime i...