Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
If i configure this command on my cisco CPE with a value of 1440, why do i still have packets who has a mss of 1460, while i clearly see the TCP three-way handshake? I'm no wireshark expert, but maybe you guys can tell me what i am doing wrong? I hav...
Gents,My crc errors are steadily increasing on the Ethernet segment, but when i ping the BGP neighbor (so packets travel accross this "bad" segment) i do not see any packets going bad. Anyone got an explanation for this?How is this possible, i would ...
I have something I really don’t understand about l2vpn in comparison to l3vpn connections.With l3vpn we have 2 mpls label the top label for communicating between the PE and the PE (most likely loopback ip’s of these routers) and we have the mpls vpn ...
Hi,Im a bit mad actually because there is something i do not understand and ofcourse there will always be things like that but since this is my profession i just have a need to understand it. I see the following on one of our customers router. I see ...
I agree with you completely! Although the funny thing is, that the host is still sending packets out with a MTU of 1500 bytes. (DF BIT not set) i could say that this particular node is not RFC compliant.
I have send out a NEW wic card to the site, we are going to replace it, both sides are configured as 100/full hard coded (auto neg = off) Will keep you posted!
Hmzz, thats interesting, did email the ISP and they have told me that their port was configured (hard coded) as 100 full, but Ethernet only goes so far as 10..., but i believe them. Looked up at Cisco site. I do not know why it is saying indeed Ethe...
Thhx Eehab, unfortunately i manage this router remotely, but i have arranged someone on site to help me with this. Will get back to you once this has been done.
