Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all,i recently upgraded my ISE two-node deployment from 3.2 P11 to 3.5 P4. Before upgrading i had a look to ISE 3.5 compatubility documentation at this link https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-5/compatibility_doc/b_ise_sdt_35.html...
Hi all,i have a small SD-Access Deployment with 4 fabric sites, one of them is a very small site deployed with FiaB, all the Transit are configured as "IP-based".In every fabric site (except the "FiaB" one) i have two Border Nodes where i configured ...
Hi all,all our corporate laptops authenticates in corporate networks performing 802.1X EAP-TLS, via a user Certificate and all is working fine, we are running ISE 3.2 Patch 7.The Matching CAP profile is using "Subject - Commmon Name" for identity che...
Hi All,i need help in understanding ASA 5545-X lifecycle as we are still working with an HA pair.I see, from the EoL/EoS notices, (https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/asa-5500-series-next-generation-firewalls/eos-eol-notice-listing.html) ...
Hi @aleabrahao , thanks for your reply and for sharing your experience on that. Generally speaking, i'm always afraid about how TAC will manage a potential SR if the version is not "offically" listed in the compatibility matrix, that's why i like to ...
Hi @ammahend ,thanks for your reply, this is the first document i checked when upgraded to ise 3.5 the first time, then i had some doubt just because of the compatibility matrixes inside the ios xe releases notes. So, happy to know that the document ...
Hi Andrii,thanks for your kinfd reply, in other words, due to the fact that all the internal subnets are directly connected to the border, any possible route for the same subnet, received by a reverse announce in BGP will be ignored due to the higher...
