Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have a RV320 that is the core of our church network. We initally purchased it to serve 3 primary networks: the office network (closed), the general purpose network (also closed but not on the office network) and a guest network.The router serves t...
I suppose I should have posted an update. After spending several thousand $US, we have given up on Cisco. The Wireless Access points, VPN routers and switches ALL proved to be completely unreliable or missing basic functionality. We sold the entire l...
At issue here isn't that I am running out of DHCP addresses. The real issue here is the inflexibility of the RV320 router. The RV320 will not allow ANY subnet mask for any network that is bigger than a /24.Even if I were to utilize an external DHCP s...
That's the issue. The router doesn't allow the definition of a VLAN with anything but a /24 or /24 based VLSM (/25, /26, etc). There is no way to configure a /8 or /12 subnet mask.If I use a $50 TrendNet router, I can create a 10.1.1.0/8 network and ...
Mainly because we also have a pair of Cisco WAP550 clustered AP's. These provide excellent coverage, and we would prefer to use them.We can run DHCP outside of the RV320 - but the problem remains that in order to use the WAP550's we would need to def...