Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,
Currently I am seeing a high TX/RX utilization on one of the links between 4507R and 3650. Below are the interface details.
On 4507 side,
S_4507R_2#show interfaces gigabitEthernet 6/24 GigabitEthernet6/24 is up, line protocol is up (conne...
Hello,
I need help on understanding the problem we are facing with one of our 3850 stack. The stack is currently supporting 4 switches.
We have a high CPU utilization for the past one week and I am trying to find the reason. I couldn't get any s...
Apologies for the late reply, I have been coordinating with Cisco TAC for this issue.
We have tried options like increasing the Softmax buffer etc.
Finally, it seems the bandwidth requirements are little higher and added one more up-link. That do...
No, we didn't enable IPV6. And also, I analysed the "Show Tech-support" in Cisco CLI analyzer and the result was a bug "CSCuo14511" for "stack-mgr" high CPU utilization.
We are going to upgrade the stack to rectify this.
Currently, the version its running is "IOS-XE Software, Catalyst L3 Switch Software (CAT3K_CAA-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.07.01E".
Can you please describe, which one are the platform and forwarder processes again?
This is the output for "sh proc cpu sorted | exclude 0.00"
Core 0: CPU utilization for five seconds: 10%; one minute: 45%; five minutes: 46%Core 1: CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%; one minute: 66%; five minutes: 56%Core 2: CPU utilization for...
