Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hey Cisco Forum,
I'm running a lab for some routing simulations and have come across some weird route summarization that I can't work out an answer to.
My lab looks like this (from a routing perspective at least):
BGP1 (Palo Alto FW)---OSPF Pid120-...
Morning Guys,
I moved my LAB configuration into a live datacentre over the weekend with some interesting results.
I upgraded the code on a VPC pair of NX-OS 9k's from nxos.7.0.3.I2.3 to nxos.7.0.3.I7.1.
My GNS3 Lab was running VM instances on ...
Hey Guys,
I fired up the lab yesterday and fixed the routing issues I was seeing in the OSPF process.
Adding a Layer3 point-to-point link across the vPC for OSPF process 10 and OSPF process 120 corrected the LSA advertisements and FA.
Despite...
Hi Rolf,
Yes I spotted that, and thanks for supplying the link.
I'll do some digging to see if I can see why the LSA has a non-zero forwarding address on NXOS-Core-2.
Thanks again,
Dan
Hey Georg,
Thanks for jumping in.
The iOS I'm running in the lab doesn't support show ip bgp topology. I think show ip bgp should do it though. I've included some show commands for OSPF too, I think the issue is within OSPF.
As shown in the ou...
