Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have lab scenario working on L3 VPN to test for the environment where PE connection to two MPLS P providers. In my lab shows only one MPLS provider(P1 and P2)CE1<->PE1<->P1<->P2<->PE2<->CE2However in PE both sites, route learning between PE and P a...
Hi Guru,Since RSVP can distribute label, in network scenario where implementing only MPLS TE and VPNl3 and every PE have fullmesh MBGP, I don't need to enable LDP to make it works. What is the advantage on top of RSVP if we have to enable LDP?
Dear all, I have the scenario where CE is connecting to PE with one serial interface and have multiple DLCIs. Each DLCI is assigned to seperate VRF on PE. Now my question is how to control priority between each DLCI, for example, appA on dlci 100 mi...
If you meant multi-VRF = VRF-Lite, think about one physical router that have more than one routing tables. You can see it from sample scenario from cisco url below.http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/ong/15400/r50docs/r50mli0s/545vrf.htmH...
Thanks shivlu replied back. Anyway, I did tested in my lab and the flow works just fine without ldp enable in the P routers. Here is my network topology. CE1--PE1--P1--P2--PE2--CE2Below was some result i can post since i can't have access to my lab. ...