Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi, all. I seem to have a very unusual problem. I've got a 7206VXR with an NPE-400 and four PA-MC-2T3+ port adapters. It's running 12.2(18)S12. The symptom I'm seeing is that a configured, but inactive, T1 interface on a T3 will be in an up/down ...
I have redundant DS3 circuits between two sites (see diagram). Each site (A & B) has redundant switches and routers. Certain hosts have redundant NICs (with an internal failover mechanism).I'm using EIGRP on all routers. HSRP is configured such th...
Thanks for the response, but this is certainly not normal.First, there is no device connected on the other end of the up/down link. Second, the amount of traffic inbound approaches the full T1 bandwidth. That's certainly a lot more than keepalives....
That's a valid point.In the case of a switch B1 failure, the multi-NIC host on LAN B will detect the link failure almost instantaneously. It will begin using its alternate link to switch B2. It will still send to the same virtual IP address using t...
If I understand correctly, you want: o vlan 6 users to be able to access vlan 1 and vlan 2 users o but vlan 1 and vlan 2 users can not access vlan 6 usersIf the above is correct, you're not going to be able to achieve this with access lists. Think...
WS - I appreciate your offer. But there's nothing in the configs that's not conveyed in the diagram. All connections to the switches are layer 2, and all router-to-router links are layer 3 (routed) subnets. It's a pretty straight forward design - ...
FWIW...I see one of the hosts is using private addressing and the other public. Is NAT involved? If so, perhaps an rsync initiated by the outside host can't get through the NAT. You should be able to overcome this with a static NAT translation.Als...