Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I keep reading about the MPLS VPN, including a recent Cisco document. They keep referring to MPLS VPNs, but the closest reference to any real VPN was to "Layer 2 VPNs". What L2 VPN? The best that I could decipher was some possible inference to L2TP a...
To have an exploit for a router to remotely gain access to the "exec" privilege level of the router. This was demonstrated quite succesfully at Black Hat, expanding on previously known vulnerabilities in IOS. How pervasive is the patch (does everyone...
your english was fine.... and I suppose I myself shouldn't have blurred the line between VPN and encryption. I am just trying to gain some clarity with MPLS VPN, since the term 'VPN' has various uses. The understanding is as I suspected, that MPLS VP...
I agree that Virtual seems to imply encryption, while not strictly specified. I see how L1 isolation could be similarly described as VPN. Good. I suppose I shouldn't have focused on encryption. I would make comment, as you seem to say, that too much ...
You are very correct. And this mal-crafted IPv6 packet would provide total remote control. BTW, hackers (pick your color) around the world have heard about Cisco's reaction to the presentation (*can you say fiasco?*) and are dedicating their efforts ...
Actually, this is about the flaw from this spring (and worsened when combined with the theft of Cisco IOS source code). There is a patch also from earlier this year. But The first demonstrated exploit was this week at Black Hat. The exploit took a fe...
Looks like an internal system was pinging external networks (I am assuming this is a router or firewall log). I would guess that the 192.168 network is your internal network using RFC1918 addressing. 192.168.4.1 appears to be pinging two class A netw...