Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Need feedback on this proposed config:I am going to be retiring a set of Meraki MX/MS systems and the servers behind them that were configured as public pass-through for hosting websites. The meraki and the switches and all servers behind it were co...
OK after much mucking around I got this all working. Some notes:since the original router was part of a meraki VPN, when I attempted to create (after disconnecting the old router and bringing it in-house) the public IP Address range I desired as a VL...
Well aware. In this case the moved servers are there only for backup and archive purposes and won't be able to be accessed from the internet at all, nor do they need to really access the internet (though they can) since once the retention period expi...
so if I punch the ipsec ports through to the secondary MX, won't that intefere with VPN to the primary MX? Just trying to think this through ahead of time. My thought was:* I have workstations that are between the two (behind the primary mx, but in...
Why should users have to buy a licsensed product. Meraki was always about NOT charging per user for stuff, but now if you want to connect an android device you need a license? Bs. Meraki could solve this in an instant by just adding support for one ...
And calling this "solved" when in fact the Meraki is still broken is also not really very accurate. Basically:Cisco Meraki used to work with Android (and pretty much every device).Cisco Meraki no longer works for all those devicesCisco isn't botherin...
