10-22-2012 08:51 AM
Hi Folks,
First of all I am new the job and have very little ACE expierence. I work on a large campus. We have to 6513's with an ACE blade in each. A few contexts configured for different applications. Basically the server guys have come to me and asked me to enabled stickiness on one of there contexts.
Now I am sure this is basic stuff to ye guys but I am just wondering what I need to do? Can I implement this on the fly without causing an outage? I have cut and paste the relevant context below. And added the changes I think that need to be made. Do you guys think this will work and will it cause any outage?
I appreciate any help at all guys:
Here is current config:
probe tcp APPS-PROBE
port 8080
interval 3
passdetect interval 5
parameter-map type ssl SSL-APPS-ADVANCED
cipher RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
rserver host SERVER1
ip address 10.10.10.1
inservice
rserver host SERVER2
ip address 10.10.10.2
inservice
ssl-proxy service SSL-APPS-PROXY
key appfiles.pem
cert appfilesCAcert
chaingroup APPFILES-CHAINGRP
ssl advanced-options SSL-APPS-ADVANCED
serverfarm host APPS-FARM
predictor leastconns
probe APPS-PROBE
rserver SERVER1 8080
inservice
rserver SERVER2 8080
inservice
class-map match-any APPS-VIP
2 match virtual-address 10.10.10.4 tcp eq https
policy-map type management first-match MGT-POLICY
class class-default
policy-map type loadbalance first-match APPS-POLICY
class class-default
serverfarm APPS-FARM
policy-map multi-match APPSPOLICY
class APPS-VIP
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy APPS-POLICY
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
ssl-proxy server SSL-APPS-PROXY
service-policy input APPSPOLICY
Will adding the following to the context make stickiness work?
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source STICKY-APPS-FARM
timeout 720
timeout activeconns
replicate sticky
serverfarm APPS-FARM
policy-may type loadbalance first-match APPS-POLICY
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm STICKY-APPS-FARM
I am really lost on this and only getting this from looking at stickiness on other configs. Can you guys advise will this work.
10-25-2012 02:24 AM
Sorry for another post but even though I can ping the box from the ACE I can't from the 6500.
10-26-2012 11:29 AM
Hi Netter,
If sounds good open a TAC case to check on this issue
---------------------
Cesar R
ANS Team
11-07-2012 07:17 AM
Hi Cesar,
Sorry for the delayed reply as I was on holidays. We found a fix. By adding the mac addresses in with a static entry in the fwsm context on the inside interface it fixed the problem and the servers remained contactable after 5 mins on the ACE.
As we won't be adding other servers to this context and after more testing it seems only this context is affected we are happy with this solution so we don't need to open a tac case.
No idea what caused this though.
Thanks for all the help.
Nettie.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide