What formula/calculation does Cisco use on the content switches for CPU Utilization? Our switches show 100% utilization, but the switches seem to be functioning normally.
Funny you should mention that. I'm checking in here to see if anyone's mentioned seeing CSS 11154's go to 100% CPU after being accessed with a browser to manage them rather than telnet. Ours are running v5.005 & we just discovered this to be the case. The switch doesn't "act" like it's at 100% - not sluggish to type on or sisplay commands via console or telnet, not enough connection activity to warrant it, etc. I'm about to search the buglist then open a TAC case. Maybe this is your issue, too.
These are 11050 switches running V.501, and we new the http sessions would increase CPU, but we see it at 100% even with Telnet, and they usually show 100% all the time.
Hmmm, must be some other combination of events that's triggered the CPU display bug.
We actually tried v5.02 awhile ago but it also had a CPU display bug, something to do with the way VRRP was being handled. Maybe the bug also exists in 5.01... are these redundant boxes?
