02-21-2003 08:32 AM
I am working with a non-Cisco cache/proxy engine, trying to use WCCP v2 dynamic services to intercept HTTP, MMS, and RTSP requests in transparent cache mode, using the L2-Rewrite encapsulation that's described in the WCCP spec.
My test gear happens to be a 2600 router with IOS 12.1(3)T. All the documentation says that it handles L2 encapsulation, but the WCCP messages don't include the Capabilities Info and I can't tell whether the negotiation was successful.
I can provide as many gruesome details on the setup as you want, but I am trying to develop a general purpose product capability that will operate correctly in a wide range of customer environments. We do not want to use GRE tunneling, for performance and other reasons both in the router/switch and in the cache/proxy engine.
Is there a magic decoder ring? I can make my WCCP agent say anything I want, but the rest of the environment is a frustrating black box.
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-21-2003 11:35 PM
where in the documentation did you see that the 2600 could do this ?
Could you please give me a link ?
I believe only Cat6500 and Cat3550 can do the L2 forwarding.
I don't think any router can do it. Only L3 switch.
Gilles.
02-21-2003 11:35 PM
where in the documentation did you see that the 2600 could do this ?
Could you please give me a link ?
I believe only Cat6500 and Cat3550 can do the L2 forwarding.
I don't think any router can do it. Only L3 switch.
Gilles.
02-22-2003 02:49 PM
It is not an explicit statement either way. One of the key features of WCCP v2.0 is the L2-Rewrite option, and IOS 12.1 supports WCCP v2.0, and the 2600 series (and many other routers) support IOS 12.1. I can easily believe that some devices support L2-Rewrite and other don't, but it would make a developer's life much easier if the restrictions were more obvious.
Since posting the question, I have verified that the router is redirecting the traffic via a WCCP-GRE tunnel. Handling that will force us to modify the platform kernel - not our first choice, but doable.
02-23-2003 12:29 AM
ok - I see the reasoning.
However, the 2600 does not support this feature.
As I said, only a layer 3 switch is capable of doing this and at Cisco it is the cat6k, the cat3550 and the cat4400.
Gilles.
02-24-2003 06:45 AM
Thanks -- More work for me...
09-13-2005 08:53 AM
1. Can You suggest me a low end router that supports L2 rewrite?
2. Is it true that routers dont support L2 rewrite feature?
3. Can you suggest a router which supports masking?
-Ananth (ananth.arockia@gmail.com)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide