cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
4553
Views
25
Helpful
5
Replies

Last reload reason: Critical process dbm fault on rp_0_0 (rc=138)

sauviks85
Level 1
Level 1

WS-C3850-12X48U operational on 16.3.6, standalone rebooted with the below error

Last reload reason: Critical process dbm fault on rp_0_0 (rc=138)

Do not see a crash file generated either. Can someone assist to identify what the issue might be?

5 Replies 5

Leo Laohoo
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
CSCvd96372

The bug here states that when a stack of 3850 connected to 4500x over a 10G etherhcannel we can confirm that my symptoms fall in line with this bug. I do not have a 4500 chassis connected to this switch. Moreover the affected release here is 16.3.2 but our switch is operational on 16.3.6 and the fix i believe is available on 16.3.5. 

We have only one Etherchannel built over 2 1G ports connecting to another 3850. The fault type make me curious too, as per the bug it is wcm fault (Wireless controller Module, maybe) and in my case it is dbm fault 

 

TBH-E-API-1-HUB-XA-1#sh etherchannel sum
<Output omitted>!!


Number of channel-groups in use: 1
Number of aggregators: 1

Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
6 Po6(SU) LACP Gi1/1/1(P) Gi1/1/2(P)

 

TBH-E-API-1-HUB-XA-1#sh cdp nei Gi1/1/1
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - Phone,
D - Remote, C - CVTA, M - Two-port Mac Relay

Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID
TBH-E-PSB2-1-SR-XC-1
Gig 1/1/1 169 R S I WS-C3850- Ten 1/0/6

Total cdp entries displayed : 1

 

TBH-E-API-1-HUB-XA-1#sh cdp nei Gi1/1/2
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - Phone,
D - Remote, C - CVTA, M - Two-port Mac Relay

Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID
TBH-E-PSB2-1-SR-XC-1
Gig 1/1/2 179 R S I WS-C3850- Ten 2/0/6

 

It doesn't have to be a 4500 at the other end.

The Cisco bug link says it is for rc=133 but the original post is for rc=138 ?

When in doubt, raise a TAC Case.