I'm hoping someone can explain the difference I see when using different sanboxes. I'm trying to build a simple protoype network configuration to demonstrate how an Enterprise CML license could help my organization but I can't explain why when I use one of the CML sandboxes (HTML5) the simulation shows what I expect (CML_image) but when I reserve & use one of the VIRL sandboxes (like: Multi-IOS Cisco Test Network Sandbox) I see something very different (VIRL_image). The CML sandbox imports a yaml file but doesn't seem to have a way to run autonetkit while the virl boxes imports .virl files but only supports Live Visualization vs simulation and I've noticed that it has trouble synching between the editor and pane. Is this just the expected difference in behaviour between VIRL and CML? I wanted to have the ability to use the editor (like in VIRL) but be able to simulate configurations like CML. TIA
