We're deploying a 2-node ISE cluster.
In the past we've always done:
Node1: PAN-Primary, MnTSecondary, PSN
Node2: PAN-Secondary, MnT-Primary, PSN
In a recent best practice slide deck, it shows using the same node1 for both primary PAN & MnT.
I wonder if that was a typo, or not a typo, but instead a new recommendation, or have I just been doing it the wrong way?
=======
Also, in a 2-node cluster, which node would you use as the "Primary" RADIUS server for the WLC & switches?
In the past I've always used whatever's NOT the primary MnT node, because it's busy doing a lot of logging and disk I/O.
However, doesn't the secondary MnT node also do the same logging as well, so it's just as busy?
So is the answer pretty much: doesn't matter, either node can provide equal amount of AAA service?
