07-26-2021 06:58 PM
Hello,
I knew that when a Cisco AnyConnect VPN user connects , for that user there is no VPN Logon Event is created in AD.
I normally use AD based rule in Firewall Rule , but for VPN Users not able to use any Firewall Rule using AD Group. This does not seem like work. And I use User Agent in FMC to get the IP to Username Mapping Info.
My question is , if use ISE instead of "User Agent" does this behavior will change for VPN user ?
Looking to know some user experience , who is aware of this problem and resolved the issue.
Any reference documentation, for this issue will be much appreciated.
07-26-2021 08:55 PM
Hi @MSJ1 ,
please take a look at: AD Integration with Cisco ISE 2.x. and ISE Configuration for VPN.
Hope this helps !!!
07-28-2021 10:43 AM
Hello @Marcelo Morais
I looked at this tube you shared ( ISE Configuration for VPN ) , here radius authentication is with ISE but in my scenario it is not.
in my scenario , FMC is managing firewall where I am thinking to implement ISE as Passive Identity Solution , when ASA is doing radius authentication from another radius server not the ISE.
Hence was asking If I can use ISE/ISE-PIC for my below issue
"normally use AD based rule in Firewall Rule , but for VPN Users not able to use any Firewall Rule using AD Group. This does not seem like work. And I use User Agent in FMC to get the IP to Username Mapping Info.
My question is , if use ISE instead of "User Agent" does this behavior will change for VPN user ? Will I be able to use AD Based Rule in FMC if I use ISE as Passive Identity Solution for VPN Subnet ?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide