cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2606
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

arp-permit-nonconnected issue with back to back firewalls

cooper.dan
Level 1
Level 1

Good Morning,

 

I have an issue similar to this, https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11848306/arp-permit-nonconnected but is different in that the ISP has a firewall instead of a router in place.

Connectivity between both firewalls (on a private /30 subnet) is fine and dandy but as soon as I use the 'secondary/29' subnet, basically a pool of private addresses have given to nat with, I get nothing leaving the firewall egress interface. Routing is in place for the secondary network but no traffic is being generated towards the ISP firewall.

I have confirmed static nat and xlate connections through the firewall but nothing leaves the egress interface. My firewalls is ASA 9.2, the ISP is (I think) 9.1.

Have I missed something obvious? Diagram below.

Best Regards

Dan

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi Cooper,

Try the following command and check whether it works or not:

no nat (INSIDE,1Net) source static INSIDE_NETWORK_10.0.0.0 1net_xlate_128

nat (INSIDE,1Net) source dynamic INSIDE_NETWORK_10.0.0.0 1net_xlate_128

If it doesn't work please share the packet-tracer ouput.

 

Regards,

Prateek Verma

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

Vibhor Amrodia
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

What do you see in the captures on the Inside Firewall egress interface ? How are you testing the traffic.

Also , have you configured a route on the Secondary Firewall for this subnet ?

I think some relevant configuration on this issue would be required to look into this issue in a bit more detail.

Thanks and Regards,

Vibohr Amrodia

Hi Vibor

The secondary firewall (.2) is the ISP firewall and have been reliably informed that the necessary routes for our source subnet (1.1.1.128/29) are in place.

This is not yet a live service so all ip and icmp are open to any host on any interface.

The Nat statements I have in place on my firewall are:

object network INSIDE_NETWORK_10.0.0.0
 subnet 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0

object network 1net_xlate_128
 host 1.1.1.128

nat (INSIDE,1Net) source static INSIDE_NETWORK_10.0.0.0 1net_xlate_128

NAT is established:

NAT from INSIDE:10.0.0.0/8 to 1Net:1.1.1.128
    flags sT idle 0:55:48 timeout 0:00:00
NAT from 1Net:0.0.0.0/0 to INSIDE:0.0.0.0/0
    flags sIT idle 1:56:46 timeout 0:00:00

Connections are going out but with no bytes. Testing is just pinging at present (which is failing). Packet-tracer is happy.

I just want to know that what I've configured is appropriate in this instance.

Regards Dan

 

 

 

 

Hi Cooper,

Try the following command and check whether it works or not:

no nat (INSIDE,1Net) source static INSIDE_NETWORK_10.0.0.0 1net_xlate_128

nat (INSIDE,1Net) source dynamic INSIDE_NETWORK_10.0.0.0 1net_xlate_128

If it doesn't work please share the packet-tracer ouput.

 

Regards,

Prateek Verma

Prateek,

That worked, thank you.

Could you go into why the static entry failed?

Many Thanks

Dan

Hi Dan,

In this scenario you were trying to map a subnet with single ip so it's a dynamic PAT, that's the reason it was not working with static keyword.

Regards,

Prateek Verma

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card