02-25-2016 12:23 AM - edited 03-12-2019 12:24 AM
the traffic is not forwarded unless i make it more specific
02-26-2016 12:09 AM
Can you give a specific example?
Most ASA's have a default route yet somehow people still manage to get to more specific routes on the Internet ...
02-26-2016 12:24 PM
Hi Philipe,
what i am having is that i have a route pointing to interface DMZ with 192.168.0.0/16 for all my branches , but when i try to communicate not working after a while i tried to be more specific , it worked with a route pointing to the subnet it self for example route dmz 192.168.1.0/24
02-26-2016 07:37 PM
Hi,
When you used the supernet route did you use a packet-tracer command to verify if it was taking the correct route ?
Regards,
Aditya
02-29-2016 02:03 AM
Hi,
no i did not use the packets tracer , only sh route to verify the routing table and it gave me the below
sh route 192.168.17
Routing entry for 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0, supernet
Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.168.11.1, via x
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
02-29-2016 07:44 AM
Hi,
Please share the output for show asp table routing.
Regards,
Aditya
02-29-2016 10:43 AM
Have you configured policy based routing?
02-28-2016 10:46 AM
There is nothing wrong with using a supernet route.
Have you got any dynamic routing protocols (or even reverse router VPN injection) running that could be injecting more specific routes?
02-29-2016 02:01 AM
No i do not have any other routing only static
03-01-2016 05:29 AM
Hi,
What is your ASA version? Do you have NAT configured?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide