11-13-2003 12:01 PM - edited 02-20-2020 11:06 PM
Hi.
Having just read a doc regarding how failover is implemented on PIX 515Es - I noticed something that I'm hoping somebody out there will have a good answer for:
"It is recommended that you connect the Primary and Secondary PIXes with a dedicated switch. Do not use crossover cables."
This is talking about the LAN failover link and the Stateful failover link. What I want to know is why it is not recommended and what the issue is with using crossover cables? Surely putting in another switch to connect the units introduces a point of failure that isn't required?
FYI the doc I'm refering to is http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094ea7.shtml#before
Thanks,
Colin
11-13-2003 03:14 PM
Sure, that switch could be another point of failure.
But think about this, the failover will occur when the lan failover interface loses carrier. If you are using a crossover cable, and one of your pix's goes to toast, what happens with the other pix's ethernet interface? If you are using a crossover cable, it will see the interface down as well.
Big problem...the stateful lan failover link needs to have a connection up..hence, the reason for the switch.
Maybe not the best explanation..but you get the idea ?
11-14-2003 02:27 AM
Makes perfect sense, thanks.
Colin
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide