04-05-2015 09:26 AM - edited 03-11-2019 10:44 PM
Hello all,
Quick question and advanced apologizes is this is the wrong place to post this. Trying to understand Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding I have to ask what is the difference using the two methods below if any? Thank you all in advance for your time to read and help a stranger out.
access-list 101 deny 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
access-list 101 deny 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any
access-list 101 deny 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip any any
interface FastEthernet 4
Description WAN/Outside Zone
ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx 101
versus
interface FastEthernet 4
Description WAN/Outside Zone
ip access-group 101 in
04-05-2015 01:22 PM
This commands check the incoming packet "source ip" and matches in its routing table and sees if this network is reachable only through that interface.
Example
if you have this route in routing table
192.168.1.0/24 via gi0/0
So the traffic from 192.168.1.2 should only come from gi0/0. This is called strict mode.
04-05-2015 02:50 PM
Thanks for the reply. Would not both methods (uRPF & static ACL) prevent spoofed traffic from the private IP ranges from ingress traffic to the WAN interface?
04-05-2015 03:01 PM
well uRPF is an intelligent way of avoiding spoofed traffic. Where configring static ACL is difficult unless you have idea of what all ACE you need to create. rpf feature can do it intelligently with the help of routing table. uRPF can also help in avoiding traffic loop where a route is coming back looping from a wrong interface.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: