The ability of various Cisco Catalyst switches to support different frame sizes depends on many factors, one of which is the hardware and software involved. Certain modules can support larger frame sizes than others, even within the same platform. Additionally, maximum frame size support can also change based on the software version used.
Jumbo frames are frames larger than the standard Ethernet frame size of 1518 bytes, which includes the Layer 2 header and Frame Check Sequence (FCS). In other words, jumbo frames refer to Ethernet packets of up to 9000 bytes in size. In Catalyst 4500 series switches, the Supervisor III and IV can handle packets up to a maximum size of 9198 bytes.
Jumbo frame support can be enabled on these types of interfaces:
Switched Virtual Interface (SVI)
Physical interface (Layer 2 (L2) / (L3))
When the jumbo frame feature is enabled on a port, the port can switch large or jumbo frames. This feature optimizes server-to-server performance. The default Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) frame size is 1548 bytes for all Ethernet ports. The MTU size is increased to 9216 bytes when the jumbo frame feature is enabled on a port.
On a Cisco Catalyst 3750 series switch, the jumbo frames are supported on the Gigabit Ethernet ports. The MTU cannot be changed on an individual interface. It must be set globally. The switch must be reset afterward in order for the MTU change to take effect.
Jumbo frame support is available in Cisco IOS Software Release 12.1(13)EW and later for the Supervisor III and IV. On the 4000/4500 platform, jumbo frames are supported only on non-blocking Gigabit Ethernet ports on certain blade models. These are the Gigabit modules and specific ports that support jumbo frames:
Both supervisor uplink ports on Supervisor III (WS-X4013) and Supervisor IV (WS-X4014)
WS-X4232-GB-RJ, ports 1-2 only
WS-X4418-GB, ports 1-2 only
WS-X4412-2GB-TX, ports 13-14 only
The configuration of this feature is performed on each port, as shown:
So I'm not sure if this involves a nuance in Packet Tracer or if there's something I'm doing wrong -- one thing is for certain, though I don't yet totally understand the network command although I will have a question on that later. I want the neighbor re...
HiCan anyone help to answer the below question Which two statements about SW2 are true? (Choose two)A. Interface Gi5/1 is using a Cisco proprietary trunking protocolB. On interface Gi5/1, all untagged traffic is tagged with VLAN 113C. The device is config...
Dear Readers, i have a question which i cannot solve after reading multiple Cisco ASA 5508-X docs. The issue is the following: We have one Cisco ASA 5508 in our firm which handles multiple IPSEC tunnels to our customers, including SNAT and DNAT...
Hi, I am looking at a Cisco managed switch to do the following:- have 3 or 4 VLANs: private, office, guest and optionally shared (that could go in private and be shared via ACL rules)- Each VLAN in a different subnet- private VLAN: PC to manage all V...