LSMPI - Linux Shared Memory Punt Interface - memory pool is being used to transfer packets/messages from the forwarding processor to the route processor. This memory pool is carved at router initialization into pre-allocated buffers, as opposed to the Processor pool where IOSXE can allocate memory blocks dynamically.
It is therefore expected to see this low amount of free memory in lsmpi_io. In fact, it would be more of a concern to see a large amount of free memory for that pool as it would mean IOSXE wasn't able to allocate that memory.
Also, examining show buffers and the lsmpi_rx and lsmpi_tx secions, we can see that the free buffers counters are 0.
Private particle pools:
lsmpi_rx buffers, 416 bytes (total 8194, permanent 8194):
0 in free list (8194 min, 8194 max allowed)
8194 hits, 0 misses
8194 max cache size, 0 in cache
3316582 hits in cache, 0 misses in cache
lsmpi_tx buffers, 416 bytes (total 4098, permanent 4098):
0 in free list (4098 min, 4098 max allowed)
4098 hits, 0 misses
4098 max cache size, 4089 in cache
1952353 hits in cache, 0 misses in cache
If your snmp application is polling this memory or pool statistics, it will generate false positive alerts. It would therefore be better to discontinue polling the lsmpi_io pool or lsmpi buffers.
Dear All, Attached is the Network Diagram. Details are as below NK1 and NK2 are VPC peer switches, NK1 Is VPC master and all HSRP Active switch. NK2 is STP ROOT switchWe have a nuatanix node connected to both the switches. Issues is as folllow&n...
I am having 3 SOHO routers connected. Router 1 and 2 cannot do static route.Here is the topology:ISP--R1--R2--R3--Switch SG350R1 - Wan: public IP, Lan: 192.168.10.1R2 - Wan: 192.168.10.2, Lan: 192.168.0.1R3 - Wan: 192.168.0.2, Lan: 192.168.1.1 Switch...