This issue happens when installing Catalyst 4000 modules (for example, WS-X4148-RJ45V, WS-X4148-RJ) in slot 10 of the Catalyst 4510R chassis.
The Catalyst 4510R switch supports the Supervisor Engine V and V-10GE. The Supervisor Engine has a nonblocking, full-duplex, switching fabric that provides connections between the Supervisor Engine and the switching modules.
Slot 1 is reserved for the Supervisor Engine only, which provides switching, local and remote management, and switch-status monitoring. Slot 2 is reserved for a redundant Supervisor Engine only. Slots 3 through 9 are available for switching modules.
When using a Supervisor Engine V, slot 10 is a flex-slot for use with the 2-port Gigabit Ethernet switching module (WS-X4302-GB) or the Access Gateway Module (WS-X4604-GWY) only.
To resolve this issue, try any of the resolutions steps.
Use a Supervisor Engine V-10GE, which supports any module in slot 10.
Use Gigabit Ethernet switching module (WS-X4302-GB) or the Access Gateway Module (WS-X4604-GWY) if you are using Supervisor Engine V.
I'm trying to understand the difference between the device ID, system IP & local system IP that you get from a REST API poll of the device API? Can these be different and if so under what conditions? Thanks
I wanted to set up a small home-server (with yunohost.org). When I try to forward the ports, so that I can access the server from "outside" of my local area network, the searched ports appear in the "UPnP Port Forwarding Table". But they're still not acce...
I have an SDWAN setup where I'll be having a local DIA in the branch and centrailzed DIA in the hub site. I'm trying to achieve internet availability using centrailzed policy in this way :1- Traffic will be first proffered utilizing the local DIA.2- ...
Hi, When I try to create a user under the General Settings - User Administration section in the web UI I get a 'Configuration failed to apply, Invalid input Detected'. I have put in many different combinations of username/passwords and nothing works....
Dear,I am creating this discution to confirm if a distribution from Static to Eigrp would work properly in the following scenario.I have two static routes in my Core Switchip route 192.168.229.0/24 192.168.142.44ip route 192.168.229.0/24 192.168.142.43 me...