Clearly they've just been propagated when then router and IOS get upgraded.
My question is should we remove all the old workarounds, and how often do people audit their configs?
Anything after 12.3 is not vulnerable, so it could safely be removed, but then it doesn't really hurt to leave them since we aren't expecting any of those protocols to be coming from the internet. There is always the possibility that someone will just copy it to a router with an older vulnerable IOS.
Obviously there will be a small amount of additional processing overhead on the acl too.
IntroductionComponentsSupported EndpointsPrerequisitesWindows 10 Endpoint ConfigurationCisco ISE ConfigurationValidating the configuration with flowSolutions when Agentless Posture failsVerifying endpoint flow if Agentless Posture flow failsIssues & T...
hello, I am reviewing the External RESTful Services (ERS) Online SDK and there are several cases required to update file: WEB-INF/classes/com/cisco/cpm/ers/sdk-resources.properties, dose anyone know how to do it?
What is SecureX?
All AMP for Endpoints subscriptions include Cisco SecureX, which is built-in. SecureX is a cloud-native platform that turns your infrastructure into a fully integrated ecosystem, by aggregating capabilities across the Cisco Security port...