08-30-2003 12:52 PM - edited 03-09-2019 04:36 AM
I'm trying to make an object-group of all my services and I can't seem to do it the same way I did my servers.
I have a service groups like this:
object-group service name_services udp
description DNS Services
port-object eq domain
I tried to make a new one for all of them:
firewall(config)# object-group service all_services tcp-udp
firewall(config-service)# ?
At the end of show <command>, use the pipe character '|' followed by:
begin|include|exclude|grep [-v] <regular_exp>, to filter show output.
description Provide a description up to 200 characters.
group-object Configure an object group as an object
port-object Configure a port (service) object
firewall(config-service)# group-object ?
Usage: [no] group-object <object_group_id>
firewall(config-service)# group-object name_services
Adding obj to object-group (all_services) failed; obj and group type inconsistent
As you can see it fails saying it's not the same type? Any Ideas?
09-01-2003 02:33 PM
Hierarchical or nested obj-groups can only be of the same type. You have tried to nest different types of groups.
The following example shows how to use the object-group network subcommand to create a new network object group and map it to a existing object-group:
pixfirewall(config)# object-group network sjc_ftp_servers
pixfirewall(config-network)#network-object host sjc.ftp.servers
pixfirewall(configpixfirewall(config-network)#network-object host 172.23.56.195
pixfirewall(config-network)#network-object 193.1.1.0 255.255.255.224
pixfirewall(config-network)#group-object sjc_eng_ftp_servers
pixfirewall(config-network)#exit
You will have to make your name-services group tcp-udp or your all-services group just udp to do this.
HTH,
S
09-02-2003 03:15 PM
Ummm... ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can't make groups for tcp and udp then make a all group for udp-tcp.....!!!
Now I'm stuck with two bad options...
Either make the groups tcp-udp which I don't want to do, or make three groups for tcp, udp and icmp, which doubles my rules per server.
A clean solution like making a tcp-udp group with udp only and tcp only group-objects would be the way to go and Cisco should look into it.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide