Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
There are various threads already bemoaning the lack of inbound firewall rules for Non-Meraki VPN Peers (bump for Product Management to take a look at that please), but rather than just pile-on, I wanted to see if anyone had got this working by way o...
Sorry for the n00b question, but I cannot seem to get a straight answer on this from a Meraki rep or any of the online documentation:Is the Twinax stacking cable with SFP+ connectors (https://meraki.cisco.com/product/switches/switches-accessories/swi...
I've got an MX65 (with the 2 WAN and 10 LAN switch ports onboard) and an MS120-8LP switch daisy-chained off it to provide more switch ports. I'm only running a single VLAN and IP subnet, the MX is in 'Routed' mode and I have client tracking configur...
Is there any reason this approach wouldn't work if I used an MX in place of the ASA/FTD in these diagrams? Sometimes it's nice to stick with a single platform, single licence renewal, etc., and cloud-managed patching on the MX is always a plus.
Personally, I would do L3 on the switch (MS225) and leave the MX to handle WAN routing only. I am making an assumption that the MXs don't implement L3 switching, so you're talking about actual CPU-based routing.