About keibler09

keibler09 · 01-18-2022

Hey folks, I am running into an issue with getting my FLEXVPN working through NAT. I am running two 3925s with switch modules. One is the edge router and the other is where the VPN terminates as the hub. The remote side is a CSRv. If reconf...

keibler09 · 02-04-2022

Hey Folks, To follow up I switched the crypto ipsec transform-set to transport vs tunnel. This allowed the connection to work through NAT. So digging a little further I added the "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4" command under the tunnel interface on the ...

keibler09 · 01-20-2022

Baron, Using SNMP to make config changes is not the way to go.. Flavio is correct in the programming languages but did not mention netconf. You may want to check out the 9k program guide. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/...

keibler09 · 01-20-2022

I have opened a case with TAC. We spent some time on it today with no resolution. Once we resolve the issue I will post the solution.. l

keibler09 · 01-19-2022

Yes, all the VRFs are configured correctly. There are no VRFs other than the connection for the VPN on the FVRF & IVRF. When I reconfigure and connect the FLEXVPN remote client directly to the hub the FLEXVPN connects. At that point I can pass traffi...

keibler09 · 01-18-2022

Mauricio, The first command may not work if it is not an optical SFP. What you do is to check if the transceiver is being recognized by the switch . Some of the other commands may work but I do not have access to a 9500 right now to validate. I...

Member Since	‎05-12-2020 02:24 PM
Date Last Visited	‎12-21-2023 04:58 PM
Posts	10
Total Helpful Votes Received	26

User Statistics

User Activity

FLEXVPN failing through NAT - TS_UNACCEPTABL

Re: FLEXVPN failing through NAT - TS_UNACCEPTABL

Re: Need help scripting config changes via snmp on Nexus 9k

Re: FLEXVPN failing through NAT - TS_UNACCEPTABL

Re: FLEXVPN failing through NAT - TS_UNACCEPTABL

Re: C9500-40X fails port negotiation